MG 6

This car was once a symbol of a new chapter in MG's history: development took place in China, and assembly was carried out at British facilities. The car attracted buyers with generous standard equipment and an affordable price tag.
However, owners complained about the outdated interior and not the best build quality. Moreover, the range of powertrains was quite limited, and the large V8 was distinguished by excessive fuel consumption.

Opel Mokka

From a technical standpoint, this small crossover has proven to be reliable. However, early owners complained about an overly stiff suspension and a "lifeless" steering wheel.
Typical ailments of early examples included issues with adaptive headlights, rattles in the glass, and clutch relay failures.

Ford Fiesta 1.0 EcoBoost

This hatchback with the EcoBoost turbo engine was designed as the ideal city dweller: compact but lively. However, early engine versions had a "wet" timing belt that rotated directly in the oil.
The manufacturer promised that such a belt would last up to ten years of service or over 240 thousand kilometers. In practice, however, the oil accelerated its wear, and detached particles clogged the oil filter, often resulting in very expensive repairs.

Ford Ka

The first generation of this model became a real test of patience due to corrosion. Rust most quickly ate away at the sills, door edges, and the area around the fuel filler flap.
Initially, the Ford Ka was powered by the old 1.3 Endura-E engine, which dated back to the late 1950s. Later modifications with newer engines proved to be more economical, while the first ones consumed more fuel and did not impress with their dynamics.

Land Rover Discovery 4

A used Discovery 4 may seem like a good deal: the chassis is shared with the Range Rover Sport, and prices on the secondary market are attractive. However, there is a significant nuance.
The model is notorious for frequent electrical issues. According to Carwow, the average owner of a Discovery 4 spends over 115 thousand hryvnias on repair work. Some owners, however, have had to invest up to 1.5 million hryvnias in maintenance (if calculated according to British rates).