In the first article on tire tests, we present the results of tests by the "Za rulem" publication, which conducted them at the AvtoVAZ testing ground. One of the most popular tire sizes, 185/60R14, was chosen for the test. The geography of manufacturing plants is vast, from the UK to the Philippines, from Portugal to Russia. This list also includes a Ukrainian tire.

1. Nokian Hakka Green / 959 points
| | Pros - Excellent braking properties on dry and wet asphalt
- Excellent road holding at high speed
- Extreme maneuvers can be performed at high speed on both dry and wet asphalt
- Brake better than others on wet asphalt
- Low noise level
Cons |
Summary: Ideal outside the city on paved roads, economical.
2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 / 943 points
| | Pros - Minimal braking distance on wet and dry asphalt
- Excellent road holding at high speed
- Extreme maneuvers can be performed at high speed, but slightly inferior to Nokian in this component
- Low noise level on good road surfaces
Cons - Feel any road irregularities
|
Summary: Strengths will be especially evident outside the city on good asphalt roads, economical.
3. Pirelli Cinturato P1 / 925 points
| | Pros - Good braking properties on dry asphalt
- Excellent road holding at high speed on dry and wet asphalt
- Can perform sharp lane changes at high speed on dry roads
- Low noise level on good road surfaces
- Economical both outside the city and in the city
Cons - Average braking distance on wet roads
- Feel any road irregularities
|
Summary: Good on suburban highways with good surfaces, economical.
4. Hankook Kinergy eco / 916 points
| | Pros - Good braking properties on dry asphalt
- On wet roads, braking performance is close to the test leaders
- Hold the road well, but having a wide "zero", when changing lanes, they respond to steering with a delay
- The car performs lane change maneuvers excellently on wet roads. In this indicator, Hankook is on par with the leaders
- Silent and soft on good surfaces
Cons - Directional stability could be better
|
Summary: They perform well in the city and outside the city on roads with quality surfaces.
5. Nordman SX / 915 points
| | Pros - Good braking on dry and wet asphalt
- Good directional stability, however, there are delays when changing lanes and a vague "zero"
- Silent and quite soft
Cons - There is a slight tendency to skid
- On a "cut-up" road, the car vibrates
|
Summary: They perform well in the city and outside the city on paved roads.
6. Bridgestone MY-02 Sporty Style / 893 points
| | Pros - Good braking properties on dry asphalt
- Low noise level
Cons - Braking on wet asphalt could be more effective
- At high speed, poor directional stability, unclear "zero"
- When performing extreme maneuvers on dry roads, speed has to be limited due to skidding
- Low ride comfort
|
Summary: For good roads.
7. Yokohama C.drive2 / 891 points
| | Pros - Hold the course clearly at high speed, but lane change maneuver is hindered by a wide "zero" and delayed response to steering
- Silence and comfort on roads of any quality
- Economical
Cons - During sharp maneuvers on dry or wet asphalt, speed is limited by low feedback
- Tendency to skid
- Average speed on wet roads
|
Summary: Tires for lovers of comfort and fuel economy.
8. Amtel Planet T-301 / 887 points
| | Pros - Good steering response
- Maneuvering is possible at high speed. Speed is limited by sharp skidding, but the car can be straightened with a quick reaction. Good steering feedback will help
- The same is typical for wet roads
Cons - Poor braking results on wet and dry asphalt
- Noisy
- Stiff
- Increased fuel consumption on suburban roads
|
Summary: Good outside the city, but not on dirt roads.
9. Michelin Energy XM2 82T / 879 points
| | Pros Cons - Poor test results on wet and dry asphalt
- At high speed, the car is unstable, poor steering response and wide "zero"
- Prone to skidding on dry roads when changing lanes
- Even more skidding on slippery roads
|
Summary: For lovers of leisurely driving.
10. Cordiant Sport 2 (PS-501) / 872 points
| | Pros - Brake satisfactorily on wet asphalt
Cons - Braking on dry roads is unsatisfactory
- Unclear "zero", delayed reactions, at high speeds constant course correction is required
- Extreme maneuvering on dry roads is difficult. Speed is limited by the danger of deep skidding
- Noisy and stiff
- Increased fuel consumption
|
Summary: For driving in city traffic jams.
11. Contyre Megapolis / 828 points
| | Pros Cons - Braking is unsatisfactory, the difference with the leader is 5.8 m.
- Lack of "steering feel" on wet roads, speed is limited by deep skidding
- Extreme maneuvers are possible at a noticeably lower speed than others
- Do not hold the course quite clearly on a straight line
- Stiff
- Increased fuel consumption
|
Summary: Despite the last place, Ukrainian tires are quite suitable "for leisurely driving". True, it is necessary to carefully monitor the distance.
Summary table of test results:

Earlier, AvtoPortal wrote about how tire rolling resistance affects fuel consumption and what aquaplaning is.