In the first article on tire tests, we present the results of tests by the "Za rulem" publication, which conducted them at the AvtoVAZ testing ground. One of the most popular tire sizes, 185/60R14, was chosen for the test. The geography of manufacturing plants is vast, from the UK to the Philippines, from Portugal to Russia. This list also includes a Ukrainian tire.

rezina01.JPG



1. Nokian Hakka Green / 959 points

  Pros

  • Excellent braking properties on dry and wet asphalt
  • Excellent road holding at high speed
  • Extreme maneuvers can be performed at high speed on both dry and wet asphalt
  • Brake better than others on wet asphalt
  • Low noise level

  Cons

  • Somewhat stiff

Summary: Ideal outside the city on paved roads, economical.

 2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 / 943 points

  Pros

  • Minimal braking distance on wet and dry asphalt
  • Excellent road holding at high speed
  • Extreme maneuvers can be performed at high speed, but slightly inferior to Nokian in this component
  • Low noise level on good road surfaces

  Cons

  • Feel any road irregularities

Summary: Strengths will be especially evident outside the city on good asphalt roads, economical.

3. Pirelli Cinturato P1 / 925 points


  Pros

  • Good braking properties on dry asphalt
  • Excellent road holding at high speed on dry and wet asphalt
  • Can perform sharp lane changes at high speed on dry roads
  • Low noise level on good road surfaces
  • Economical both outside the city and in the city

  Cons

  • Average braking distance on wet roads
  • Feel any road irregularities

Summary: Good on suburban highways with good surfaces, economical.

4. Hankook Kinergy eco / 916 points

  Pros

  • Good braking properties on dry asphalt
  • On wet roads, braking performance is close to the test leaders
  • Hold the road well, but having a wide "zero", when changing lanes, they respond to steering with a delay
  • The car performs lane change maneuvers excellently on wet roads. In this indicator, Hankook is on par with the leaders
  • Silent and soft on good surfaces

  Cons

  • Directional stability could be better

Summary: They perform well in the city and outside the city on roads with quality surfaces.

5. Nordman SX / 915 points

  Pros

  • Good braking on dry and wet asphalt
  • Good directional stability, however, there are delays when changing lanes and a vague "zero"
  • Silent and quite soft

  Cons

  • There is a slight tendency to skid
  • On a "cut-up" road, the car vibrates


Summary:
They perform well in the city and outside the city on paved roads.

6. Bridgestone MY-02 Sporty Style / 893 points

  Pros

  • Good braking properties on dry asphalt
  • Low noise level

  Cons

  • Braking on wet asphalt could be more effective
  • At high speed, poor directional stability, unclear "zero"
  • When performing extreme maneuvers on dry roads, speed has to be limited due to skidding
  • Low ride comfort


Summary:
For good roads.

7. Yokohama C.drive2 / 891 points

  Pros

  • Hold the course clearly at high speed, but lane change maneuver is hindered by a wide "zero" and delayed response to steering
  • Silence and comfort on roads of any quality
  • Economical

  Cons

  • During sharp maneuvers on dry or wet asphalt, speed is limited by low feedback
  • Tendency to skid
  • Average speed on wet roads

Summary: Tires for lovers of comfort and fuel economy.

8. Amtel Planet T-301 / 887 points

  Pros

  • Good steering response
  • Maneuvering is possible at high speed. Speed is limited by sharp skidding, but the car can be straightened with a quick reaction. Good steering feedback will help
  • The same is typical for wet roads

  Cons

  • Poor braking results on wet and dry asphalt
  • Noisy
  • Stiff
  • Increased fuel consumption on suburban roads

Summary: Good outside the city, but not on dirt roads.

9. Michelin Energy XM2 82T / 879 points

  Pros

  • Quiet and soft
  • Economical

  Cons

  • Poor test results on wet and dry asphalt
  • At high speed, the car is unstable, poor steering response and wide "zero"
  • Prone to skidding on dry roads when changing lanes
  • Even more skidding on slippery roads

Summary: For lovers of leisurely driving.

 10. Cordiant Sport 2 (PS-501) / 872 points

 

  Pros

  • Brake satisfactorily on wet asphalt

  Cons

  • Braking on dry roads is unsatisfactory
  •  Unclear "zero", delayed reactions, at high speeds constant course correction is required
  • Extreme maneuvering on dry roads is difficult. Speed is limited by the danger of deep skidding
  • Noisy and stiff
  • Increased fuel consumption

Summary: For driving in city traffic jams.

 11. Contyre Megapolis / 828 points

  Pros

  • Quiet

  Cons

  • Braking is unsatisfactory, the difference with the leader is 5.8 m.
  • Lack of "steering feel" on wet roads, speed is limited by deep skidding
  • Extreme maneuvers are possible at a noticeably lower speed than others
  • Do not hold the course quite clearly on a straight line
  • Stiff
  • Increased fuel consumption

Summary: Despite the last place, Ukrainian tires are quite suitable "for leisurely driving". True, it is necessary to carefully monitor the distance.

Summary table of test results:

 shinu-185-60-r14.jpg

Earlier, AvtoPortal wrote about how tire rolling resistance affects fuel consumption and what aquaplaning is.