| Alexander DIVAKOV | Pavel KARIN | Photo by Stepan Shumacher

Toyota sellers are clearly aiming at gentlemen. They skillfully turn their weakness for women into commercial gain. The fresh Yaris hatchback, like the new RAV4, arrived at dealers just in time for March 8, saving wealthy men from the headache of choosing a gift for their better half. The calculation is correct. But if we assume that the gift could be another brand, doubts are inevitable. In what ways does the new Yaris surpass such charmers as the Nissan Micra or Citroen C3? And what does it do worse than the Suzuki Swift, Mitsubishi Colt, or Honda Jazz?

One thing is clear: a car for a woman must have two pedals — an automatic, a robotized manual, or a CVT. We took this into account. The Micra has a classic automatic with a torque converter, the Yaris, C3, Colt, and Swift have robotized manuals, and the Honda Jazz is equipped with a CVT.

test-drive-52.jpg

The gifts are not cheap! The most affordable participant in our test — the Mitsubishi Colt 1.3 — is priced at $15,490. That's more than they ask for the base Mitsubishi Lancer! And the Yaris 1.3 we got costs as much as $20,450... In Europe, such cars are much more affordable, so they sell like hotcakes. The first-generation Yaris sold 1.2 million units over six years and became Toyota's most successful model in the Old World. The Japanese attributed the failure of the "firstborn" in Russia to the immaturity of the market. Simply put, they set a price on the Yaris that made it impossible to approach. Especially since a cute Peugeot 206 soon appeared, which cost much less. The market turned out to be quite ready for it. Now, judging by the price tag of the new Yaris, the market has matured for it too.

test-drive-53.jpg

If we set aside the price, it is in this class that design plays almost the main role. And here — choose to any taste! Some will be won over by the "toy-like" nature of the Micra, others by the "hemisphere" of the C3... And the new Yaris seems to have gathered the features of all: it is "one-box" like the Colt, and "rounded" like the Micra. And although compared to its predecessor, the car has lost a lot of charm, it looks fresh and cohesive. But the Yaris's gaze is somehow dissatisfied, as if it just woke up.

test-drive-0.jpg test-drive-1.jpg test-drive-2.jpg
You need to get used to reading the extravagant instruments
The Yaris has the most original interior with a "central" instrument cluster
In the top R3 version, the engine is started with a button

The interior is tastefully done. Light plastic on the doors visually "rings" the windows, the symmetrical front panel is decorated with a centrally located instrument cluster and a "traffic light" of microclimate controls, and the front seats have "stampings" in the shape of the letter "Y". To remind you: this is a Yaris. The materials can't be called expensive, but the build quality is impeccable. Six closed compartments for small items are hidden in the front panel, and there are also two open ones on the sides of the central console.

test-drive-3.jpg
The climate "traffic light" is aesthetic but not very practical The MultiMode gearbox "stumbles" during shifts but works a bit softer than other robotized manuals
test-drive-5.jpg test-drive-6.jpg
The Toyota has good seats with stylish "stamping"
There is enough space and transformation options in the back

Behind the wheel, a person up to 190 cm tall can sit without problems, and for those who are shorter, there is seat height adjustment. The only thing missing is an adjustable lumbar support (only the Micra has it) and a greater range of steering column adjustment. Although it adjusts in two directions, shorter drivers want to "pull" the wheel a bit more toward themselves, and taller ones want to raise it higher. But the "donut" itself with audio system control buttons is good, and the digital instruments are at least original — thanks to a clever optical scheme, their readings seem recessed into the bowels of the engine compartment. The microclimate control is also unusual — the vertically arranged knobs can be both turned (to select air temperature or fan speed) and pressed (to control ventilation modes and window heating). It's beautiful but not very convenient: you have to reach for the lower button-knob, and when selecting air flow directions, you need to check the display, which is distracting.

test-drive-7.jpg test-drive-8.jpg test-drive-9.jpg
The Yaris's front panel is the most "spacious" Easy Flat system: the backrests fold flush with the floor with one hand movement

Visibility in the Yaris has minor complaints: when looking for the exterior mirrors, the eye stumbles upon the corner windows in the doors, and the interior mirror could be larger. But access to the cabin is perfectly convenient: you can open and close the car without taking the key out of your pocket — just press a button on one of the front doors or on the trunk lid. The engine is also started with a button. By the way, a similar "key" is also in the Micra, but there the engine is started by turning a plastic handle.

test-drive-54.jpg

The Micra's interior, though not as original as the Yaris's, is no less cozy. On the two-tier front panel and doors, there are plastic inserts with a fabric texture, and the climate control buttons and automatic selector are made of "ivory"... But the Micra's ergonomics are not flawless. The steering wheel can move vertically, although it clearly lacks reach adjustment. The seats lack contouring and adjustment ranges: drivers taller than 180 cm are already uncomfortable here.

test-drive-55.jpg

In the Colt, on the contrary, even a person 190 cm tall has a couple more clicks of the seat rails in reserve (after all, the Colt was created before Mitsubishi's "divorce" from Mercedes, and Mercedes have always been famous for excellent longitudinal adjustment ranges!). The only flaw is the slippery steering wheel, adjustable only for height. But the design is good: the instruments are hidden in deep wells, the round ventilation deflectors are framed with pronounced rims, and the microclimate knobs, audio system, and the pillar under the central console are illuminated in pale green. But the unusual body shape causes visibility problems: the "minivan" pillars interfere with looking to the sides, the exterior mirrors are noticeably shifted back, and as a result, you have to turn your head more.

Citroen C3: extravagant but not informative Under the steering wheel — gear shift "paddles"

There is also a highlight in the Honda's interior. The instruments here are "optitron", and the audio system and climate control buttons are of the rocker type, tick-tock. Unlike traditional buttons, they are easy to manipulate by touch. And duplicate control of the stereo, as on the Micra and Yaris, is placed on the steering wheel. The driver's seat is one of the best in our company, with good lateral support and an impressive longitudinal adjustment range. True, miniature female drivers may find the seat too large, but they can raise it. It's a pity that there is no steering wheel reach adjustment and no footrest for the left foot.

test-drive-12.jpg test-drive-14.jpg
The C3's interior harmonizes with its exterior The SensoDrive gearbox is not smooth in shifts The Citroen has the most inconvenient "climate" control
The Citroen had both, plus a digital speedometer like the Yaris. But unlike the Japanese car, the French hatchback constantly keeps the speed reading in front of your eyes, making you feel like an inspector with a radar who never quite decides to record a violation. You just want to turn on the flashing lights, pull over the Yaris with a colleague, and collect three hundred rubles! We also didn't like the shapeless seats — there's no sense of unity with the car here. However, the steering wheel, like the Toyota's, adjusts in two planes, and each front door has two pockets. A real treat for the ladies!
test-drive-15.jpg test-drive-16.jpg
Front seats — amorphous and flat… … and the rear bench is the tightest
test-drive-17.jpg test-drive-18.jpg
But the glovebox is huge The C3's trunk is roomy, but it lags behind competitors in transformation options
The Suzuki's interior looks deliberately simple and straightforward, but we like this restraint: a well-balanced color palette, a clear climate control unit… The driver's seat deserves special praise — a good profile and wide adjustment ranges will accommodate someone up to 190 cm tall comfortably. Visibility is also top-notch: the thin front pillars create almost no blind spots, and the mirrors show everything happening behind clearly.

test-drive-56.jpg

When it came to rear comfort, we immediately singled out the top three: Toyota, Honda, and Mitsubishi. The back is spacious, but the Jazz offers a bit more legroom and boasts the tallest ceiling, while the Yaris has the least protruding tunnel and the most comfortable bench, whose sections, like the Colt's, slide forward and backward, plus the backrests recline. Meanwhile, the Colt has the widest transformation options: the rear seat halves can not only be moved or folded but also completely removed! The Honda's cabin also folds in an original way: the backrests drop down (forming a flat and low floor), and the cushions lock vertically, allowing you to place large or not-so-clean items on the floor.

test-drive-57.jpg

In the Micra, the rear seat also slides (if there are no passengers, the trunk can be increased by 120 liters), but getting in the back is harder than in the other cars: the low opening and high threshold get in the way. And it's cramped back there: your legs press against the backrest, and your head touches the ceiling.
test-drive-19.jpg test-drive-20.jpg test-drive-21.jpg
The Honda's interior is brighter than its exterior A button on the steering wheel switches the CVT to sequential mode with paddle shifters
Audio and climate control are the most convenient to operate
test-drive-22.jpg test-drive-23.jpg test-drive-24.jpg
Honda: the most beautiful instruments in the sextet Two-tier glovebox in A4 format The CVT works flawlessly
In the Swift, it's a bit more spacious, but no extra amenities — alas. And the Citroen's passengers have it worst of all: neither space nor adjustments. All that's left is to be glad the French car has a fairly roomy trunk. The Yaris, on the other hand, has the smallest cargo area, but the cabin is spacious. But the Honda engineers took the best care of passengers and luggage: load away!
test-drive-25.jpg test-drive-26.jpg
Seats — a dream for the "average-sized" person The Jazz's rear backrests can be folded, and the cushions lifted
test-drive-27.jpg test-drive-28.jpg test-drive-29.jpg
The Jazz is spacious in the back Voluminous trunk — with a flat floor Fashionable repeaters on the mirrors
The power difference reaches 12 hp: the weakest engine is in the Honda (83 hp), and the strongest is in the Mitsubishi Colt (95 hp). But don't rush to conclusions! In this case, you'll agree, what matters isn't the power itself or even the acceleration time to 100 km/h. The key is that the driver (more often — the driveress) finds it easy to control the speed! And here, the cars with "robots" (Colt, C3, Swift, and Yaris) have nothing to boast about, alas: during acceleration, they unpleasantly "stumble" at every shift. This is least noticeable in the Yaris — possibly due to its not-so-powerful engine (88 hp). But if you take the Suzuki's gearbox out of its usual economy mode by pressing the "E" button, the Swift will perform better than the other "robotized" siblings: shifts become quicker, and the gas pedal more responsive. A similar mode (Es) exists in the Toyota's MultiMode transmission, but it's less effective. Manufacturers usually defend "robots" by saying they're more affordable. But in our case, that's only true for the Yaris: for the Toyota's automated manual, you'll pay an extra $600, while the "robots" in the Colt or Swift cost $1000 — no savings compared to the Micra's true "automatic" or the Jazz's CVT!

test-drive-58.jpg

The Micra's automatic gearbox, despite its four speeds, proves preferable to the "automated" ones in almost all modes. The Nissan Micra launches without pauses, upshifts are very smooth, and downshifts have noticeable but unobtrusive delays. Keeping pace in city traffic is a pleasure, especially if you press the "Overdrive off" button, limiting the automatic to three gears. But even the Micra's gearbox pales in comparison to the Jazz's CVT! The Honda accelerates more smoothly and responds better to the gas pedal: no delays, no jerks. Despite the modest engine capabilities, managing the Jazz's dynamics is the most enjoyable. And you can have some fun: want to drive aggressively — engage Sport mode, and the CVT will hold higher revs at the same speeds, making throttle responses sharper. Want to feel like a racer — press the "7 speed mode" button on the steering wheel, and the CVT will mimic a sequential seven-speed gearbox, whose gears you can shift with paddle shifters.

test-drive-59.jpg

All six cars brake confidently and without losing directional stability: each has ABS, most (except the Jazz) have electronic brake-force distribution, and four (excluding the Colt and C3) also have an "emergency" Brake Assist helper. There are few complaints. The sensitive brakes of the Honda and Citroen require getting used to, and the Citroen's responses are ambiguous — the booster seems to lag. But the Citroen's handling is in perfect order. The most informative steering wheel, soft but precise reactions to turns, confident stability on arcs and straights. Chassis tuning flaws are felt only on uneven surfaces — diagonal rocking in corners somewhat reduces response precision, and unpleasant disturbances are transmitted to the steering wheel.
test-drive-30.jpg test-drive-31.jpg test-drive-32.jpg
Micra: stylish interior, but ergonomically not flawless
The climate control "knuckles" are convenient, but the display lens glares
test-drive-33.jpg test-drive-34.jpg test-drive-35.jpg
The instruments are perfectly readable
In the glove box there is a tray for documents By sliding the rear seat forward, you can increase the trunk volume by a third
test-drive-36.jpg test-drive-37.jpg
The Micra's seats are not ideal — the adjustment ranges are small, and the lateral support is somewhat weak The rear is a bit cramped, especially for tall passengers

The Honda's steering wheel behaves quite differently — it transmits almost no information to the driver, and in our company it is the most "empty" steering wheel. For fast driving on a winding road, this is a minus, but in everyday situations it does not cause much trouble: the clearly "relaxed" nature of the Jazz's steering invites a calm driving style, and the suspension treats bumps quite indulgently.

test-drive-33.jpg test-drive-34.jpg test-drive-35.jpg
The instruments are perfectly readable
In the glove box there is a tray for documents By sliding the rear seat forward, you can increase the trunk volume by a third
test-drive-36.jpg test-drive-37.jpg
The Micra's seats are not ideal — the adjustment ranges are small, and the lateral support is somewhat weak The rear is a bit cramped, especially for tall passengers

Suzuki, like Honda, almost does not notice bumps in corners. No rocking, no yawing — and the smallest body rolls. On a straight line, the Swift holds perfectly, and the electric power steering, if it yields to the Citroen's in terms of feedback, then only slightly — mainly due to a more stretched "zero". But the reactions to steering turns are just as soft, precise, and predictable, and, unlike the Mitsubishi, at any speed.

test-drive-60.jpg

On a straight line, the Colt holds up well, and in calm corners it pleases with a decent, albeit slightly artificial, build-up of steering effort. But as soon as you enter a corner a bit more actively, the car squats on the outer rear wheel — and spontaneously "turns" into the bend or, worse, sharply slides into a deep oversteer. To say the least, not the best behavior! Especially given the "sluggish" electric power steering. This car desperately needs a stability control system, but it does not have one — just like all the other hatchbacks (a stability control system can only be installed on the Citroen — naturally, for an extra charge). But if the Colt compensates for this "shortcoming" with a more or less humane price, then the reasons for the absence of stability control systems on the Yaris and Micra are unclear. After all, for the $18,530 that the Micra costs, one would like to have an additional "insurance" — just in case.

test-drive-61.jpg

The Yaris and Micra can be described in two words: softness and predictability. Both cars readily dive into a corner, confidently hold the line, and even at the limit try to save the driver's nerves — very reliable handling. The differences are only in details. For instance, the Micra reacts more sharply to rough bumps, while the Yaris reacts to ruts. The electric power steering in both cases intervenes too intrusively, but in the Micra the steering wheel is still slightly more responsive.

test-drive-38.jpg test-drive-39.jpg test-drive-40.jpg
Suzuki: the interior is strict and functional The "E" button can improve the behavior of the "robot", but fuel consumption will increase
There is no climate control even for an extra charge

Meanwhile, the Yaris surpasses all competitors in ride smoothness — its ability to swallow deep potholes could be the envy of cars in a higher class, not to mention its classmates. The only thing the newcomer is sensitive to is waves in the road surface: it does not rock on them, but it "renders" all the "ripples" in too much detail. And the Yaris is also the quietest: tires, engine, and wind are almost inaudible. It is no wonder the Japanese "conjured" with the placement of engine mounts, new sound-absorbing materials, and double door seals.

test-drive-41.jpg test-drive-42.jpg test-drive-43.jpg
The instruments are simple and clear, with indication of transmission modes
The glove box is not large
The rear seat folds in parts and in two stages
test-drive-44.jpg test-drive-45.jpg
The Suzuki's seats have a successful profile and a good range of adjustments
The rear of the Swift is more spacious than the Nissan's, but the seats lack adjustments

The Honda is slightly less comfortable: on waves, the body rocks a bit, and at speed, aerodynamic noises begin to annoy around the B-pillar. But it is pleasant that the CVT does not make the engine "hang" at high revs during acceleration — they build up smoothly. So passengers can easily listen to jazz or blues...

test-drive-62.jpg

Following the Honda in comfort are Nissan, Suzuki, and Citroen. Mitsubishi closes the list: the Colt has the stiffest suspension, and it reacts more sharply to rough joints and small surface defects. Plus, the Colt is the noisiest: the howl of the engine during downshifts is especially annoying.

test-drive-63.jpg

So, the main trump cards of the Mitsubishi are the most spacious and multifunctional interior, as well as the price: $15,490.

The Citroen looks and handles great, but it is a bit cramped and not too comfortable ($16,360). The Nissan is more spacious and more pleasant to drive, but it is as much as $2,200 more expensive ($18,530). Beauty demands...

The Suzuki is a more traditional car, but no less stylish than the Micra or Citroen C3. It handles excellently, its interior is attractive and ergonomic, and the price is quite competitive ($16,650). In short, the golden mean.

As for the Jazz, which, like the Nissan Micra and Citroen C3, has already celebrated its fourth anniversary, it is expensive for its age ($17,900). But the Honda has a very convenient interior and the most "driver-oriented" powertrain.

Toyota Yaris... This is perhaps the most "high-tech" car in the test. A well-tuned chassis, a spacious and comfortable interior, excellent transformation capabilities, and a level of comfort and equipment that competitors cannot yet reach. In "our" trim level, it had a CD/MP3 stereo, power windows and heated mirrors, climate control, push-button engine start, a full set of "brake" assistants, and seven (!) airbags. But for all this — $20,450. A luxurious gift.



Are they safe?

Small cars are becoming safer year after year — and the results of crash tests by the independent organization EuroNCAP confirm this. All six hatchbacks successfully passed the tough tests!

The leader is the Yaris with the highest rating of five stars and a unique in this class inflatable knee airbag for the driver. True, on the Russian market, the Yaris in the two initial versions is equipped with "only" four airbags. And the side "curtains" for head protection and the "knee" airbag are the prerogative of the most expensive R3 trim, for which the EuroNCAP crash test results are fully valid.

The other hatchbacks are "good students" with four stars out of five possible. These cars also do a lot to protect belted (we emphasize!) occupants in an accident. But there are minor shortcomings noted by experts that affected the reduction of the overall rating. Thus, the Micra was "fined" for the airbag failing to prevent contact of the driver's chest and head with the steering wheel — fortunately, not severe. In the Mitsubishi, the driver's airbag also did not work optimally, and the electric power steering mechanism deformed the floor under the driver's feet. In the Suzuki, sensors recorded increased loads on the driver dummy's chest. And the Honda Jazz and Citroen C3 drew expert complaints in side crash tests.

What's the price?

For the Citroen C3 in the base version, they ask 10,500 euros ($12,915) — this is a three-door with a 60-hp 1.1 engine in the X trim, which includes power steering, a pair of front airbags, central locking, an immobilizer, and front electric windows. The version with the 1.4 SX engine, supplemented with side airbags and heated power mirrors, costs from 11,850 euros ($14,580) on manual, and for the version with the SensoDrive "robot" — exactly the one we tested — you will have to pay 1,450 euros more ($16,300). Slightly cheaper is the C3 1.6 SX (110 hp) with a manual gearbox — 13,150 euros ($16,200). For this engine, the "robot" (+$740) or a classic "automatic" (+$1,990) are optionally available.

The entry ticket to the Nissan Micra world is a three-door hatchback with a 1.2-liter engine producing 65 hp for $12,990, which is equipped with ABS, heated front seats, and a one-piece rear bench (Comfort-M package). In the Comfort trim, where air conditioning and folding rear seats appear, a more powerful 80-hp 1.2 unit is installed — for the three-door and five-door they ask the same, $14,300. For an automatic transmission, you need to pay an extra $1,000. The Tekna version, which includes side airbags, climate control, an audio system, fog lights, and rain and light sensors, exists only in a five-door body and only with manual — the price starts from $16,950, and under the hood can be a 1.2 (80 hp) or 1.4 (88 hp) engine. The top Luxury trim, available with an automatic gearbox, will cost at least $17,750 for the three-door — it was such a car for $18,530 that we got for the test.

The Mitsubishi Colt 1.3 (95 hp) in the starting Invite version for $14,490 pleases with richer equipment than the base Jazz: here there is semi-automatic air conditioning and heated seats. For the version with the 1.5 engine (109 hp) in the Instyle body, they ask $2,000 more, but in return they give four airbags, alloy wheels, fog lights, and electric windows on all doors. Any of the versions can be equipped with a six-speed Allshift "robot" instead of manual for an additional $1,000 — it was such a unit that was on our 1300-cc hatchback.

The Suzuki Swift is offered only in a five-door body and only with a 90-hp 1.3-liter engine — the buyer chooses only the trim level. The initial GLA version for $15,550 already has six airbags, ABS, air conditioning, heated front seats, and power mirrors. The test car with a robotic transmission costs $1,100 more. The flagship GLX for $17,670 adds an audio system, fog lights, 15-inch wheels, and a chip key, familiar from the Micra and Yaris. True, climate control is not offered even for an additional fee.

The Honda Jazz 1.2 (78 hp) in the base costs $15,900, although it already includes four airbags, ABS, air conditioning, electric front windows and mirrors, and a CD player. For $16,900, the 1.4 LS version is available with an 83-hp engine, climate control, improved trim, and different optics, and the version with the CVT-7 variator and side airbags already costs $17,900.

The most expensive in this company is the Toyota Yaris. It is always a five-door hatchback with a 1.3 engine (87 hp), available in three variants. The base R1 version for $17,390 includes four airbags, air conditioning, an adjustable steering column, front electric windows, heated seats, and a CD/mp3 radio. For the R2 with the MultiMode automated gearbox, they ask $600 more, and the top R3 for $20,450 adds climate control, keyless entry, curtain airbags, a "knee" airbag, fog lights, and alloy wheels.

All five models are covered by a 3-year or 100,000 km warranty.


Before this test, on the website www.autoreview.ru, we conducted a survey: "Which car from the upcoming Autoreview test would you choose?"
The votes were distributed as follows:

Citroen C3 — 8.0%
Honda Jazz — 18.8%
Mitsubishi Colt — 13.8%
Nissan Micra — 6.1%
Suzuki Swift — 13.7%
Toyota Yaris — 39.6%
A total of 12,199 people voted


test-drive-64.jpg

Here is the revised test drive text: ## Compact Class: Battle for the City City subcompacts are perhaps the most competitive market segment. Here, every manufacturer tries to offer something special to attract buyers. In this test, we decided to gather six bright representatives of the 'B' class and find out which of them is best adapted to the realities of a metropolis, and which can surprise not only with urban antics but also on the highway. Tested were the Citroen C3 1.4, Honda Jazz 1.3, Mitsubishi Colt 1.4, Nissan Micra 1.4, Suzuki Swift 1.4, and Toyota Yaris 1.3. All cars are five-door hatchbacks with petrol engines and automatic transmissions. Prices for the tested cars ranged from $15,490 for the Mitsubishi to $20,450 for the Toyota, which in itself creates intrigue: how justified is the price difference? ### First Impressions Let me start with design. The exteriors of all six are completely different, and that's great. Some, like the Citroen C3, look stylish and even a bit futuristic; others, like the Honda Jazz, are more focused on practicality, which is reflected in their shapes. The Mitsubishi Colt seems the most aggressive, while the Nissan Micra is the cutest and roundest. The Suzuki Swift looks sporty and fit, and the Toyota Yaris looks solid and substantial. The interior is a separate matter. Inside, all cars are also very different. For example, in the Citroen C3, you feel a certain lightness and airiness, although the trim materials can't be called expensive. The Honda Jazz's interior is assembled solidly, and most importantly, it's incredibly transformable. The rear seat folds to create a flat floor, and the trunk volume increases from 380 to 1325 liters. The Mitsubishi Colt surprises with a sliding and removable rear seat, allowing you to vary space for passengers and cargo. The Nissan Micra's interior looks modern, but rear space doesn't impress: the trunk here is the most modest at just 235 liters. The Suzuki Swift pleases with a sporty seating position and comfortable front seats, but it's cramped in the back and trunk (213 liters). The Toyota Yaris offers the richest set of options, including keyless entry, a leather steering wheel, and even a driver's knee airbag. Overall, all cars are well-equipped: all have ABS, power steering, electric windows, and air conditioning. But there are differences. For example, only the Suzuki and Toyota have curtain airbags, and a knee airbag is only in the Toyota. The Mitsubishi Colt, by the way, doesn't even have a passenger airbag, which seems strange for a modern car. ### Driving Impressions But the main thing in any car is how it drives. And here, a real battle unfolded among the test participants. Let me start with the outsiders. The Nissan Micra with its 88-horsepower engine and classic 4-speed automatic proved to be the slowest. Its acceleration to 100 km/h takes a full 15 seconds. The engine works laboriously, and the gearbox responds sluggishly to throttle input. In the city, the Micra still feels tolerable, but on the highway, overtaking is best avoided. Fuel consumption is the highest at 8.6 liters in the urban cycle. The Honda Jazz with a CVT pleased with smoothness but not dynamics. Its 83-horsepower engine is the weakest in the test, but thanks to a light body (1030 kg) and a responsive CVT, the car moves briskly enough in the city. However, on the highway, the CVT keeps the engine at high revs for a long time, creating noise and causing extra consumption. According to the specs, the Jazz accelerates to 100 km/h in 14.1 seconds, but it feels somewhat faster. Cars with robotic gearboxes seemed more interesting. The Mitsubishi Colt with its 95-horsepower engine and 6-speed robot is a true sprinter. Acceleration to 100 km/h takes just 11.8 seconds—the best result in the test. The gearbox works quite briskly, although slight jerks are felt in traffic jams. But on the highway, the Colt pleases with confident pickup and even allows active maneuvering. Its suspension is somewhat stiff, but that's the price for handling. The Citroen C3 with a 90-horsepower engine and 5-speed robot seemed to me the most comfortable in this company. Its suspension perfectly absorbs bumps, and the seats are very comfortable. True, comfort comes at the cost of body roll in corners and a not-so-informative steering rack. The robot is also not without sin: in city traffic, it sometimes 'thinks.' Fuel consumption is moderate at 7.6 liters in the city. The Suzuki Swift turned out to be the most spirited and exciting. Its 92-horsepower engine revs happily to high RPMs, and the 5-speed robot works quite well. Handling is the best in the test: the car literally screws into corners. But for this, you pay with a stiff suspension and cabin noise. The Swift has the smallest trunk (213 liters), and the manufacturer doesn't specify the official acceleration time at all. The Toyota Yaris, despite having the most modest engine in the test (87 hp), performed very decently. Acceleration to 100 km/h takes 13.1 seconds, which isn't bad at all. The secret lies in the successful tuning of the engine and 5-speed robot combination. The Yaris drives smoothly, confidently, and without unnecessary fuss. It may not be as exciting as the Swift, but its character can be called exemplary-balanced. Moreover, the Yaris is the most economical in the city: just 6.7 liters per 100 km. True, it also costs the most—$20,450. ### Verdict Summing up, you realize that there is no ideal car among these six, but each is good in its own way. **Suzuki Swift** is a choice for those who love driving and are willing to put up with a stiff suspension and a small trunk. It's the most emotional car in the test. **Mitsubishi Colt** is the most dynamic and perhaps the most balanced in terms of price-to-capability ratio. If you need a car that moves quickly and confidently in any rhythm, the Colt is an excellent option. **Citroen C3** is the best choice for those who value comfort above all. It's soft, smooth, and stylish, but its dynamics and handling are far from a priority. **Nissan Micra** is a car for leisurely city driving. It's cute but too slow and noisy on the highway. **Honda Jazz** is a true 'suitcase' on wheels. Its interior transformation and spaciousness are impressive, but the dynamics and engine noise leave much to be desired. **Toyota Yaris** is the most balanced car in the test. It doesn't shine in any discipline but doesn't fail in any either. An excellent, solid 'workhorse' that's worth its money. In the end, if I had to choose one car for daily use in a big city, I would probably choose the **Mitsubishi Colt** for its dynamics and relatively low price. But if comfort and style were a priority, I would seriously consider the **Citroen C3**. And for those who need maximum versatility, the **Honda Jazz** would be the best choice.
Expert Ratings from Autoreview
Parameter Max Score Citroen Honda Mitsubishi Nissan Suzuki Toyota
Design 160 140 135 140 140 140 145
Exterior 80 70 65 70 70 70 70
Interior 80 70 70 70 70 70 75
Ergonomics 160 120 130 130 120 140 125
Driver's Seat 80 60 70 65 60 70 65
Visibility 80 60 60 65 60 70 60
Dynamics 280 215 230 225 235 240 225
Acceleration 90 65 75 70 70 75 65
Braking 100 80 80 90 90 90 90
Handling 90 70 75 65 75 75 70
Ride Comfort 200 150 160 145 165 155 180
Ride Smoothness, Vibration 80 60 65 60 65 60 70
Acoustic Comfort 60 45 45 40 45 45 55
Climate Control 60 45 50 45 55 50 55
Interior Comfort 200 125 140 165 140 145 145
Passenger Seats 70 40 55 55 45 50 55
Trunk 70 50 40 55 50 55 40
Interior Transformation 60 35 45 55 45 40 50
Total 1000 750 795 805 800 820 820